Basic Notions#

(under construction)

We use order as a generic word for pre-order or posets. The category Ord is either the category Pos of posets or the category Pre of pre-orders, depending on the context.

Order-Regular Categories#

An order-enriched category is a category enriched over Ord.

An order-regular category is an order-enriched category which has

  • finite weighted limits and

  • coinserters that are stable under pullback.

For the remainder of this section, let us fix an order regular category \(\mathcal C\). We denote objects by \(A,B,\ldots\) and arrows by \(f,g,\ldots, p,q,\ldots, j,k\ldots\). We write \(f\le g\) to express that two arrow \(f,g:A\to B\) are ordered.

Weighted Limits and Colimits#

… spans, cospans, …

  • comma objects

  • co-comma objects

  • co-inserters

Example: The order \(\sqsubseteq_A\) on \(A\) is the comma of the cospan \((1_A,1_A)\).

Lemma: \((R,p,q)\) is the comma object of the cospan \((k,1)\) if and only if there is \(d\) such that \(pd=1, dp\le 1, qd=f\).

Proof: Only if is a straight-forward verification. For the other direction see here.

Factorisation System#

Every order-regular category has a factorisation system (E,M) where E is the class of coinserters and M is the class of representably fully-faithful arrows. This factorisation system supports an appropriate 2-dimensional version of the diagonalization property.

We call the arrows in E order-epis and the arrows in M order-monos.

Example: In the category Ord, the order-epis are precisely the surjections and the order-monos are precisely the embeddings (=order-reflecing maps).

Relations#

In every order-regular category we can talk about relations and weakening relations.

A relation is a span that is jointly order-mono. [1]

Composition of relations is via pullback and image factorisation. The identity relation \(I_A\) on \(A\) is the span \((1_A,1_A)\).

Given an order-regular category \(\mathcal C\), we can form the order-enriched category category of relations \(\sf Rel \mathcal C\), which has as objects the objects of \(\mathcal C\) and as arrows the relations of \(\mathcal C\).

One can understand the definition of order-regular category as providing precisely what is needed to get the following result.

Proposition: In an order-regular category, composition of relations is associative.

Proposition:

  • \(I_A \ \le \ {\sqsubseteq_A}\)

  • \(\sqsubseteq_A \,; \sqsubseteq_A \ = \ {\sqsubseteq_A}\)

To summarize, the category \(\sf Rel\mathcal C\) has:

  • For every object \(A\) an order \(\sqsubseteq_A\).

  • For every object \(A\) an identity relation.

  • For any two relations \(R:A\to B\) and \(S:B\to C\) the composition \(R\,;S:A\to C\).

  • Composition is order-preserving and associative.

Weakening Relations#

A relation \(R:A\to B\) is a weakening relation if

\[\sqsubseteq_A\,;R\,;\sqsubseteq_B {} = {} R\]

#